HOME
INSPECTION REPORT
Dates and Times of Site
Inspections: 10/18 @ 9:00 AM and 10/22
@ 3:30 PM
Weather Conditions:
Sunny, 65°, both days
Name of Owner(s):
Jack and Lisa Wright
People Present During the Field
Inspection
OVERVIEW
The report that follows has been prepared from the perspective of what an
owner of this property would benefit from knowing.
Thus, it discusses many things beyond those which are of immediate
concern. Therefore, the report needs to be read in its entirety to
understand fully all the information that has been obtained.
For your convenience, we have prepared the following overview of the
condition of the major systems of the house.
Please refer to the appropriate section of this report for a more
detailed discussion of these systems.
|
ITEM |
CONDITION1 |
REPAIRS
|
TYPICAL?3 |
|
|||||||
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NEEDED?2 |
|
|||
|
STRUCTURAL |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Foundation |
|
SR |
+ |
|
|||||||
|
Framing |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
Porches/Decks |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
Outbuildings |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
EXTERIOR |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Roofing |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Chimney |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Cladding |
|
SR |
- |
|
|||||||
|
ELECTRICAL |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Capacity |
|
|
+ |
|
|||||||
|
Wiring |
|
SR |
+ |
|
|||||||
|
PLUMBING |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Piping/Fixtures |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
Sewer |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
HEATING/AC |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Unit(s) |
|
SR |
+ |
|
|||||||
|
Distribution |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
INTERIOR |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
SAFETY |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL |
|
SR |
ü |
|
|||||||
|
1
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being best. 2
ü indicates repairs are needed within the next
year, SR means SEE
REPORT for more details. 3
ü indicates the component and/or condition is typical
for a building of similar age and construction type, a positive
sign (+) indicates that it is above average, and a negative
sign (-)
indicates that it is below average. |
|
||||||||||
Corrective Work
Because of their present condition and because of the cost of their
repair or replacement, the following are high priority items that will need your
immediate attention:
|
PROBLEM
|
COST
ESTIMATE |
|
1.
Repair and replace clapboard siding, cornice trim, fascia, soffits,
cornerboards, window frames |
$4000
- $6000 |
|
2.
Caulk and paint siding and trim |
$4000 |
|
3.
Align and repair front porch |
$4000
- $8000 |
|
4.
Brace and straighten bowed exterior wall |
$1000
- $3000 |
|
5.
Insulate first floor area |
$1000
- $2000 |
|
6.
Insulate heating/AC ducts |
$500
- $1000 |
|
7.
Install GFCIs, repair ungrounded circuits, replace knob and tube
wiring, add outlets, check wiring |
$2000
- $3000 |
Further investigation
During our inspection we were not able to fully evaluate the condition
and/or operation of the following items:
1.
Moisture levels in exterior wall cavities.
2.
The sufficiency of the heating system.
We recommend that
these items be investigated further, before assuming ownership of the property.
General
Condition
Although this is an older home, it has been constructed with quality
materials and workmanship. It is
generally in good condition. With
attention to the items mentioned in this report,
this home should offer many years of relatively trouble‑free occupancy.
INTRODUCTION
At your request, a structural and mechanical inspection of the above
property was performed on September 19, 1996.
The report that follows has been prepared based on that inspection.
The inspection was performed by and report written by William A. Stanton,
P.E.
Criterium
- Stanton Engineers offers two types of residential inspections; the Standard
Inspection and the Comprehensive Inspection.
Essentially, the Standard Inspection relies on visual evidence available
at the time of the inspection, while the Comprehensive Inspection relies on
visual evidence plus analysis, invasive testing, and extended, on-site
evaluation to reach its conclusions. Further
detail regarding these two types of inspections can be found in Appendix D of
this report.
Based on discussions prior to our inspection, you have chosen the
Standard Inspection. Our inspection
and the report that follows were conducted in accordance with the Standard
Inspection.
For your reference while reading the report, the following definitions
may be helpful:
|
Excellent
- |
Component or system is in “as
new” condition requiring no rehabilitation and should perform in
accordance with expected performance. |
|
Good
- |
Component or system is sound and
performing its function, although it may show signs of normal wear and
tear. Some minor
rehabilitation work may be required. |
|
Fair
- |
Component or system falls into one or
more of the following categories: a)
Evidence of previous repairs not in compliance with commonly accepted
practice, b) Workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted
standards, c) Component or system is obsolete, d) Component or system
approaching end of expected performance.
Repair or replacement is required to prevent further deterioration
or to prolong expected life. |
|
Poor
- |
Component or system has either failed
or cannot be relied upon to continue performing its original function as a
result of having exceeded its expected performance, excessive deferred
maintenance, or state of disrepair. Present
condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of other
adjoining elements or systems. Repair
or replacement is required. |
All ratings are determined by comparison to other buildings of similar
age and construction. Further, some
details of workmanship and materials will be examined more closely in higher
quality home where such details of workmanship and materials become more
relevant.
Appendix C contains the actual inspection field notes which contain
additional information. These
should be considered part of the overall evaluation and report.
In addition to our discussions about the condition of the various systems
and components, this report covers repairs and maintenance.
To help provide a perspective for the work we have suggested for this
home, a Maintenance Plan has been
included in Appendix A to this report.
This
report is based on an examination of the major systems in this building;
specifically the heating, plumbing, electrical, and structural systems.
This report is an opinion about the condition of this building.
It is based on visual evidence available during a diligent inspection of
all reasonably accessible areas. No
surface materials were removed, no destructive testing undertaken, nor
furnishings moved. This report is
not an exhaustive technical evaluation. Such
an evaluation would cost many times more.
Owning
any building involves some risk. Even
the most comprehensive inspection cannot be expected to reveal every condition
you may consider relevant to your ownership.
Further, without disassembling the building, not everything can be known.
You, as a responsible buyer, should examine the portions of this building
for which you are most able to judge acceptability.
This includes such things as floor coverings, interior wall finishes,
appliances, etc.
As
Professional Engineers, it is our responsibility to evaluate available evidence
relevant to the major systems in this building.
We are not, however, responsible for conditions that could not be seen or
were not within the scope of our service at the time of the inspection.
This inspection and report have been conducted in compliance with the
standards of practice of the National Academy of Building Inspection Engineers.
With the present owner's belongings blocking areas of some of the rooms,
a complete inspection of those areas was not possible.
DESCRIPTION
This house is a medium-sized residence with wood siding on the exterior
walls and an asphalt roof surfacing. There
is a basement under rear part of this building.
There is a crawl space under the front part of this building, which was
accessible for inspection. In
addition, there was a detached garage. The
garage is included in this evaluation. For
purposes of this report, the front of the home is assumed to face south.
SITE, SOILS, SETTLEMENT
Drainage of the property and surrounding area was
relatively good. We mention this
because poor drainage is a frequent contributor to differential movement in the
in the foundations of homes. It
also can be the cause of excessive moisture in crawl spaces and basements.
The house appears to be built on structurally stable soil.
There is no evidence of significant settlement or movement of foundation
walls or piers.
STRUCTURAL
|
Foundation
Type ..................................
Perimeter walls and interior piers
Foundation Walls/Piers ....................................................................
Brick Basement ......................................................................................
Partial Crawl space ...................................................................................
Partial Basement Floor .........................................................................
Concrete Crawl Space Floor
.............................................................................
Soil First Floor Framing .............................................
Wood joists and girders Roof Framing
.......................................................................
Wood rafters |
The lower attic area on the west side of the house was inaccessible at
the time of the inspection, and this limited the extent of our structural
inspection.
The basic construction of this building consists of brick foundation walls and a pier-girder system for the support
of the first floor level joist members. This
is a standard method of construction in this area.
Where visible, the foundation walls and piers are generally in good
condition. A section of the
foundation wall under the front porch is bulging inward.
The structural integrity of this section of the foundation wall is
seriously impaired and rehabilitation work is needed.